Substantial Value Transactions with Directors: Section 228 Explained

← Back to all victories Corporate & Company

Confidential Matter

Outcome

The article explains the requirements and restrictions under Section 228 of Malaysia’s Companies Act 2016 for substantial-value transactions involving directors, substantial shareholders and connected persons. It highlights the need for prior shareholder approval, abstention by interested parties, and the potential legal consequences of non-compliance, including voidability and liability for losses.

Case Background & Strategy

Section 228 of the Companies Act 2016 prohibits a company from entering into an arrangement or transaction of ‘requisite value’ to acquire from, or dispose of to, a director, substantial shareholder, or person connected with them, any non-cash asset — unless prior shareholder approval is obtained at a general meeting. The interested person must abstain from voting.

When is section 228 triggered?

Three questions decide it: (1) is the counterparty a director, substantial shareholder, or connected person of either, of the company or its holding company; (2) is the subject matter a non-cash asset; and (3) does its value meet the ‘requisite value’ threshold, assessed against the company’s asset value. Directors dealing with their own companies — buying company property, selling assets into the company, taking over business lines — are the paradigm cases.

Approval and abstention

Approval must come from shareholders at a general meeting before the transaction (or conditional upon such approval), with the interested person and persons connected with them abstaining. For transactions involving a director or substantial shareholder of the holding company, the holding company’s shareholders must also approve.

Consequences of contravention

A transaction in breach is voidable at the company’s instance, and the interested director or shareholder — and directors who authorised the deal — may be liable to account for gains and indemnify the company for loss. In oppression and derivative litigation, section 228 non-compliance is frequently the sharpest arrow in the quiver, because it converts a commercial complaint into a statutory contravention.

Frequently asked questions

Does section 228 apply to cash payments?

The section targets non-cash assets; cash transactions may instead engage directors’ duties, section 224 or fraudulent trading principles.

Can shareholder approval be obtained after completion?

The statute contemplates prior approval. Completing first and seeking ratification later leaves the transaction exposed.

How Messrs Ng, Zainurul, Seke & Khoo can help: our corporate and commercial litigation team advises boards, directors and shareholders across Malaysia on governance disputes, from advisory and board-level strategy through to trial. Contact us for a consultation.

KAT
Lead Counsel On This Matter

Khoo Ai Theng

NZSK Legal — Messrs. Ng, Zainurul, Seke & Khoo

Speak to Khoo Ai Theng directly about your matter:

📍 Puchong (Selangor)  |  Mont Kiara (Kuala Lumpur)
🕐 Monday – Friday, 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Disclaimer: This case summary is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome in future matters.
Welcome to Messrs. Ng,Zainurul, Seke & Khoo (NZSK), CLICK to Whatsapp with respective lawyer in charge and we will get back to you as soon as possible! Thank You!
//
Contact Lawyer (NZSK)
Divorce, Industrial & Employment, Corporate Dispute, Construction Dispute, Debt Recovery, Probate & letter administration & etc
Contact Lawyer 咨询律师