Home Service MyCC Investigation Defence

MyCC Investigation Defence in Malaysia — Protecting Your Business Through the Competition Commission Process

A Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) investigation is one of the most serious legal situations a business can face. MyCC has extensive investigatory powers — comparable to those of a police officer under the Criminal Procedure Code — including the power to demand documents and information, enter and search premises, access computerised data, and interview staff. The financial penalty for a Competition Act infringement can reach 10 per cent of your worldwide turnover for the entire infringement period.

At NZSK, our competition lawyers in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor represent businesses at every stage of a MyCC investigation — from the very first contact, through written and oral representations in response to a proposed decision, to appeals before the Competition Appeal Tribunal. We act from offices in Mont Kiara, KL and Puchong, Selangor, and we bring litigation expertise and competition law knowledge to every investigation we handle.

Critically, how you respond in the early stages of a MyCC investigation — including what documents you produce, what explanations you provide, and whether you consider a leniency application or voluntary undertaking — will significantly affect the outcome. Do not respond to MyCC without first taking legal advice.

Why Choose Us?

15+ Years

Law Experience

500+ Cases

Matter Handled

400+ Cases

Custody Secured

RM10Mil +

Hidden Assets Uncovered

The MyCC Investigation Process — Stage by Stage

Stage 1 — Information Request or Notice of Investigation

A MyCC investigation typically begins with either an information request (requiring the production of specific documents or information) or a formal notice of investigation. Both require prompt and carefully managed responses. You have legal rights at this stage — including legal professional privilege over communications with your lawyers — but you also have legal obligations: failure to provide information or providing false information to MyCC is a criminal offence.

We advise on the scope of your legal obligations at this stage, on how to respond to information requests in a manner that protects your legal position, on claims for legal professional privilege, and on the strategic implications of different response approaches.

Stage 2 — MyCC Investigation

During the investigation phase, MyCC may conduct interviews with directors and employees, request further documents and information, search premises (with or without a warrant, depending on the circumstances), and access electronic records and systems. We advise on managing this process — including preparing key personnel for MyCC interviews, advising on document retention and retrieval, and managing the ongoing flow of information to MyCC.

Stage 3 — Proposed Decision

If MyCC concludes that there is an infringement, it will issue a Proposed Decision — a document setting out its preliminary findings and the penalty it proposes to impose. The Proposed Decision is not final: the enterprise has the right to submit written representations and, if necessary, to make oral representations before the Commission members of MyCC within the time specified.

The written and oral representations stage is critical. This is the enterprise’s principal opportunity to challenge MyCC’s legal analysis, contest the factual findings, present exculpatory evidence, and argue for a reduction in the proposed penalty on the grounds of mitigating factors. We have extensive experience in preparing written representations and conducting oral representations before MyCC.

Stage 4 — Final Decision

Following receipt of representations, MyCC issues a Final Decision — setting out whether there is a finding of infringement, the grounds for the decision, and the financial penalty imposed. The Final Decision is subject to appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal within 30 days of the date of the decision.

Voluntary Undertakings — Section 43 of the Competition Act

An enterprise under MyCC investigation may, at any point before the close of the investigation, offer a voluntary undertaking to MyCC under section 43 of the Competition Act — committing to do or refrain from doing specific things. If MyCC accepts the undertaking, it closes the investigation without issuing a Proposed Decision or imposing a penalty.

A voluntary undertaking can be a commercially attractive option in appropriate cases — avoiding the uncertainty, cost, and reputational impact of a full investigation and decision process. However, the terms of the undertaking must be carefully negotiated: an undertaking that is too broad in scope or too long in duration can impose ongoing commercial burdens that outweigh the benefit of avoiding a formal finding. We advise on whether a voluntary undertaking is appropriate in your specific situation and on the negotiation of its terms.

Leniency — Reducing or Eliminating the Penalty

MyCC’s Leniency Programme allows an enterprise that has participated in a cartel to apply for immunity from (or a reduction in) the financial penalty, in exchange for cooperation with MyCC’s investigation. Full immunity is available only to the first enterprise to apply and requires cooperation throughout the investigation. Subsequent applicants may receive a reduction in the penalty rather than full immunity.

The decision to apply for leniency, and the timing and scope of that application, is one of the most consequential decisions a business can make in a competition law investigation. A premature or poorly structured leniency application can expose the applicant to risks it had not anticipated. We advise on leniency strategy in strict confidence.

Penalty Mitigation — Reducing the Financial Exposure

Even where an infringement is established and a penalty is imposed, there are significant opportunities to reduce the quantum of the penalty through effective written and oral representations to MyCC. Mitigating factors recognised under MyCC’s penalty guidelines include: early cooperation with the investigation; steps taken to terminate the infringement promptly; remedial action taken to address the harm caused; limited role in the infringement; and financial hardship. We advise on the most effective penalty mitigation strategy for each specific case.

How We Have Helped — MyCC Investigation Defence

Anonymised examples of MyCC investigation defence matters we have handled. Details modified to protect client confidentiality.

Manufacturing Sector  |  MyCC Information Request  |  Document Review & Response Management

The Situation

A medium-sized manufacturer in the Klang Valley received a broad MyCC information request covering five years of internal pricing communications, sales records, and correspondence with competitors and industry associations. Management was uncertain about the scope of their legal obligations, what was protected by privilege, and how to respond without inadvertently incriminating the company.

What We Did

We were engaged on the day the information request was received. We conducted an immediate privileged review of all responsive documents, identified and segregated legally privileged materials, advised management on the precise scope of the production obligation, and prepared a structured written response that was fully compliant with MyCC’s statutory requirements while appropriately protecting the company’s legal position. We also advised on internal communication protocols for the duration of the investigation.

✔  Outcome

The company made a timely, complete, and legally sound response to the information request. MyCC did not escalate to a formal investigation notice against this company — the matter was resolved at the information-gathering stage without any finding of infringement or penalty.

Professional Services  |  MyCC Proposed Decision  |  Oral Representations  |  Penalty Reduced

The Situation

A professional services firm received a MyCC Proposed Decision finding a Chapter 1 infringement and proposing a significant financial penalty calculated on its worldwide turnover across an alleged four-year infringement period. The firm disputed both the duration of the infringement alleged and the characterisation of its involvement as active rather than passive.

What We Did

We prepared detailed written representations challenging the start date of the alleged infringement period — presenting evidence that the firm’s participation only commenced at a later date — and arguing that its role was passive and followed, rather than initiated, the conduct of other participants. We requested an oral representation hearing and appeared before the MyCC Commissioners to present these arguments directly, supported by documentary evidence and legal submissions on the applicable penalty guidelines.

✔  Outcome

MyCC accepted our submission on the infringement duration, shortening the period against which the penalty was calculated. The firm’s passive role was accepted as a significant mitigating factor. The final penalty was reduced by more than 40 per cent from the proposed amount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact a competition law lawyer immediately — before responding to MyCC or taking any other steps. A MyCC communication may take the form of an information request, a notice of investigation, or a proposed decision. Each requires a different and carefully managed response. Do not attempt to respond without legal advice: what you say and what you produce in the early stages of an investigation can significantly affect the ultimate outcome. We are available to advise on an urgent basis.
You have legal obligations to cooperate with a MyCC information request — failure to provide information, providing false information, or obstructing a MyCC investigation are criminal offences under the Competition Commission Act 2010. However, you also have important legal rights, including legal professional privilege over confidential communications with your lawyers, the right not to be compelled to self-incriminate (within limits), and rights regarding the scope of any document production request. We advise on navigating these rights and obligations at every stage.
A Proposed Decision is MyCC's preliminary finding that an infringement has occurred, together with the penalty MyCC proposes to impose. It is not final. You have the right to submit written representations challenging MyCC's findings and proposed penalty, and to make oral representations in person before the Commission members. This is your most important opportunity to influence the outcome. Written representations must be substantive, legally rigorous, and submitted within the time specified by MyCC. We prepare and present these representations.
Yes. A voluntary undertaking offered and accepted under section 43 of the Competition Act allows MyCC to close the investigation without a formal finding of infringement and without imposing a penalty. The terms of the undertaking must be negotiated carefully — we advise on whether a voluntary undertaking is appropriate in your specific situation and on the negotiation and drafting of its terms to minimise ongoing commercial burden.
A Final Decision of MyCC may be appealed to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) within 30 days of the date of the decision. This is a short and strictly enforced deadline — it is critical to seek legal advice immediately upon receiving a Final Decision. See our Competition Appeal Tribunal page for full details on the CAT appeal process.

Speak to a Competition Lawyer Now!

If your business has received any communication from MyCC, or if you are concerned that your business practices may attract MyCC attention, contact NZSK for practical and commercially focused trade mark legal advice. Contact us to arrange a consultation.

Consultation by appointment — Mont Kiara, Kuala Lumpur & Puchong, Selangor

Related Topics

Competition Compliance

Competition Compliance

Private Competition Actions

Private Actions & Follow-On

Competition Appeal Tribunal

Competition Appeal Tribunal

abuse of dominant position

Abuse of Dominant Position

anti-competition agreement

Anti-Competitive Agreements

Welcome to Messrs. Ng,Zainurul, Seke & Khoo (NZSK), CLICK to Whatsapp with respective lawyer in charge and we will get back to you as soon as possible! Thank You!
//
Contact Lawyer (NZSK)
Divorce, Industrial & Employment, Corporate Dispute, Construction Dispute, Debt Recovery, Probate & letter administration & etc
Contact Lawyer 咨询律师