Legal Victory
RM 80 Million Debt Restructuring for Pandemic-Hit Malaysian Hotel Group: Three Creditor Classes, One Sanctioned Scheme
NZSK Legal guided a multi-property Malaysian hospitality group through a complex three-class creditors’ scheme — restructuring Islamic financing facilities, syndicated bank debt, and trade creditors simultaneously — and preserved over 400 jobs.
Summary
Industry
Hospitality & Tourism — Hotel & Serviced Apartments
Court
High Court (Commercial Division), Kuala Lumpur
Debt Reconstructed
RM 80.3 Million
Jobs Preserved
400+
Creditor Vote
91% Approval
Scheme Status
Sanctioned
Maxine Khoo
Published: May 5, 2026
Share this article
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic and Movement Control Orders devastated the Malaysian hospitality sector. Our client — a hospitality group operating three mid-market hotels and a portfolio of serviced apartments across Peninsular Malaysia — saw occupancy rates collapse from a pre-pandemic average of 72% to below 8%. The resulting cash flow collapse left the company unable to service its obligations to a secured syndicated lending facility, a pool of unsecured trade creditors, and a series of AITAB-structured Islamic financing facilities for its properties.
When the group’s directors approached NZSK Legal, they faced pressure from multiple creditor directions simultaneously. As a corporate restructuring law firm in Malaysia experienced in both conventional and Islamic financing arrangements, NZSK Legal assessed the situation and concluded that a multi-class scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act 2016 was the optimal vehicle — one that could address all three creditor categories in a single court-supervised process.
The Challenges
- Creditor class constitution was the central legal challenge. The group’s creditors fell into three legally distinct categories: a secured syndicated lender with conventional security interests, a pool of unsecured trade creditors with ordinary contractual rights, and Islamic financing institutions whose AITAB-structured facilities carried different contractual and Shariah-compliant terms. Incorrect classification at the convening stage would have exposed the scheme to invalidation at sanction.
- The secured syndicated lender initially opposed the scheme, preferring to enforce its security over the hotel properties. With over 25% of total debt value, a negative vote from the secured creditor class would have defeated the scheme entirely — the classic holdout problem in Malaysian restructuring practice.
- The company faced ongoing operating losses throughout the scheme preparation period, requiring careful cash management and a parallel application to the court for authority to use its reserves for scheme-related costs.
Our Approach
- NZSK Legal conducted a detailed creditor classification analysis, examining the legal rights of each creditor category in the context of Malaysian company law and comparative Commonwealth restructuring jurisprudence. Three separate creditor classes were constituted, and a legal memorandum justifying each classification was prepared and exhibited in the convening affidavit.
- We engaged directly with the secured syndicate lender’s legal advisers over six weeks before any court application was filed. Our financial modelling demonstrated that the going-concern value of the hotel portfolio under a scheme significantly exceeded the distressed forced-sale value of the same assets — a fact that changed the secured creditor’s commercial calculus.
- The secured creditor’s support was secured on the basis of enhanced scheme terms including a revised security package and step-in rights in the event of scheme default. This transformed the scheme’s largest potential opponent into its most prominent supporter.
- The scheme booklet included an independent insolvency practitioner’s comparative winding-up analysis for each creditor class, providing creditors with a clear, evidence-based comparison between scheme recovery and winding-up recovery — a best-practice requirement under Malaysian corporate restructuring law.
The Outcome
- All three creditor classes voted in favour of the scheme: the secured syndicate class unanimously, the unsecured trade creditor class at 91% in value, and the Islamic financing class at 88% in value. Each vote exceeded the 75% statutory threshold under Section 366 of the Companies Act 2016.
- NZSK Legal appeared at the sanction hearing and addressed the court’s queries on creditor classification and explanatory statement adequacy. The court sanctioned the scheme without opposition. The scheme was lodged with the Registrar of Companies and became binding on all creditors.
- More than 400 employees across the group retained their employment. All three hotel properties resumed full operations within three months of sanction. The scheme is now in its second year of implementation with all restructured obligations being met on schedule.
- This matter is one of the most complex multi-class creditors’ schemes of arrangement handled by a Malaysian law firm in the post-pandemic period, involving the simultaneous restructuring of conventional bank debt, trade credit, and Islamic financing facilities.
Key Legal Principle
“Creditor class constitution under a Malaysian scheme of arrangement is not a procedural formality — it is the legal architecture of the entire scheme. Creditors with materially different legal rights must be separately classed and separately voted. Incorrect classification at the convening stage is the single most common ground for a successful challenge at the sanction hearing.”
You Might Be Interested In
Scheme of Arrangement Convening Order — Creditor Opposition Malaysia
Members’ Scheme of Arrangement — Shareholder Deadlock Malaysia
