The Industrial Court is the specialist employment tribunal in Malaysia that adjudicates unfair dismissal, constructive dismissal, and related employment disputes referred to it by the Minister of Human Resources. Industrial Court proceedings are formal legal proceedings — with witness examination, cross-examination, written submissions, and reasoned Awards — and the quality of legal representation makes a direct and significant difference to outcomes.
At NZSK, Lawyer Khoo and our employment law team represent both employees and employers in Industrial Court proceedings across Malaysia. Our track record includes securing RM893,200 for a senior employee against Heineken Malaysia, successfully defending Corporate Partners Consultancy in an insubordination case, and winning multiple matters where claimants withdrew their cases entirely. We act from offices in Mont Kiara, KL and Puchong, Selangor.
Why Choose Us?


15+ Years
Law Experience

500+ Cases
Matter Handled

400+ Cases
Custody Secured

RM10Mil +
Hidden Assets Uncovered
The Industrial Court Process — From Filing to Award
- Filing a representation (section 20 IRA) — the employee files a written representation with the DGIR within 60 days of dismissal. This triggers the process
- Conciliation at the Department of Industrial Relations — the DIR conciliator will attempt to bring the parties to a mutually acceptable resolution. Many matters settle at this stage — sometimes on significantly better terms than a full Industrial Court award would produce
- Ministerial reference to the Industrial Court — if conciliation fails, the matter is referred to the Industrial Court by the Minister of Human Resources
- Case Management Conference — the parties attend a Case Management Conference (CMC) at the Industrial Court, where the issues in dispute are identified, document bundles are agreed, and the hearing dates are fixed
- Written statements and document bundles — the parties file written witness statements and agreed document bundles setting out the evidence they will rely on at the hearing
- Hearing — the Industrial Court Chairman hears the matter — witnesses give evidence and are cross-examined, and counsel present arguments on the law and facts
- Written submissions — the parties file written submissions addressing the legal issues, the evidence, and the applicable case law
- Award — the Industrial Court issues a written Award — finding either that the dismissal was with or without just cause and excuse, and (if without) ordering reinstatement or compensation
What Happens at an Industrial Court Hearing
An Industrial Court hearing is a formal legal proceeding — not a mediation or an informal discussion. Witnesses are called, sworn in, and cross-examined. Documents are formally tendered in evidence. Legal submissions are made on the interpretation of the law and the weight of the evidence. The Industrial Court Chairman will ask questions and will assess the credibility of witnesses.
Preparation is critical. The quality of written witness statements, the selection and organisation of documentary evidence, the rigour of cross-examination, and the strength of written submissions all directly affect the outcome. NZSK prepares every Industrial Court matter with the same thoroughness as High Court litigation.
Industrial Court Appeals — High Court Judicial Review
An Industrial Court Award may be challenged in the High Court by way of judicial review — on the grounds of error of law, breach of natural justice, or excess of jurisdiction. Judicial review is not an appeal on the merits: the High Court will not substitute its own assessment of the facts for the Industrial Court’s, but will intervene where the Award is legally defective.
In the Bina Puri case [2025] 3 MELR 660, NZSK successfully defended a High Court judicial review of an Industrial Court decision — demonstrating our capability in High Court employment proceedings as well as the Industrial Court itself.
Industrial Court — Our Results
| EMPLOYEE WIN
2024 |
Heineken Malaysia Berhad
Secured RM893,200 for a former senior IT manager at an Industrial Court hearing. One of the largest compensation awards in recent Industrial Court history. The court found the dismissal was without just cause and the evidence presented by NZSK was decisive. Reported nationally — Handled by Lawyer Khoo |
RM 893,200 |
| EMPLOYER WIN
2025 |
Corporate Partners Consultancy Sdn Bhd
Successfully defended employer at an Industrial Court hearing on insubordination charges. The Court found the employee guilty of wilful disobedience — persistently ignoring instructions, refusing to attend compulsory meetings, and disregarding written directives — and ruled the dismissal was with just cause and excuse. Tan Pei Kei v. Corporate Partners Consultancy Sdn Bhd — Award No. 369 of 2025 — Handled by Lawyer Khoo |
Claim Dismissed |
| EMPLOYER WIN
2023 |
Modern Cuisine Sdn Bhd
Represented employer — the claimant eventually withdrew his case, and the Industrial Court struck it off without liberty to refile. A complete employer victory without the cost of a full hearing. Loke Foo Eek v. Modern Cuisine Sdn Bhd — Award No. 189 of 2023 |
Struck Out |
| EMPLOYER WIN
2025 |
KBS Ideal Sdn Bhd
Represented employer — the claimant withdrew her claim and the Industrial Court struck it out without liberty to refile. Allyssa Chin Hui v. KBS Ideal Sdn Bhd — Award No. 10 of 2025 |
Struck Out |
| EMPLOYER WIN
2025 |
Blueblocks Advisory Sdn Bhd
Represented employer — the claimant withdrew her claim and the Industrial Court struck it out without liberty to reinstate. Noor Amera Atikah v. Blueblocks Advisory Sdn Bhd — Award No. 1159 of 2025 |
Struck Out |
Frequently Asked Questions
Speak to a Employment Lawyer Now!
- (+60)16-557 4789 | (+60)3-8060 0267
- [email protected]
Consultation by appointment — Mont Kiara, Kuala Lumpur & Puchong, Selangor
Related Topics
Employment Contracts
Misconduct & Domestic
Retrenchment & Redundancy
Constructive Dismissal
